Some ideas from Nmap GSoC 2013 IRC meeting

This commit is contained in:
fyodor 2013-03-24 07:45:34 +00:00
parent ea7462eb84
commit beb0886776

View file

@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
TODO $Id: TODO 11866 2009-01-24 23:10:05Z fyodor $ -*-text-*-
o Adopt an issue tracking system for Nmap and related tools. We
should probably look at our needs and options and then decide on and
either install it on our own infrastructure or use it hosted elsewhere.
- David notes that Trac seems to work well for Tor -- see
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor
- One thing which can be nice is being able to interact with the
system through email. Like for bugs people file on the Nmap package
in Debian, I can just reply to the mail and it gets added in the tracker.
o Make CONCURRENCY_LIMIT in nse_main.lua at least the min-parallelism.
Otherwise NSE is limited to 1000 socket-using threads even if you've
requested more.
@ -115,6 +124,12 @@ o Investigate WinPcap support for NDIS 6.
I'm not sure what Windows releases support NDIS 6 or what the
backward compatability is like.
o Consider re-architecting Nmap to have more of a scanning pipeline
approach rather than fixed sets of hosts which start and finish one
phase and then move into the next in parallel. This could potentially
allow us to add hosts one by one to a phase as other hosts finish that
phase and, ideally, the phases could run in parallel too.
o NSE WORK (note that this is mostly infrastructure because script
ideas are generally put on the script ideas page instead:
https://secwiki.org/w/Nmap_Script_Ideas)