mirror of
https://github.com/nmap/nmap.git
synced 2026-08-03 22:29:06 +00:00
Some ideas from Nmap GSoC 2013 IRC meeting
This commit is contained in:
parent
ea7462eb84
commit
beb0886776
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
|
|||
TODO $Id: TODO 11866 2009-01-24 23:10:05Z fyodor $ -*-text-*-
|
||||
|
||||
o Adopt an issue tracking system for Nmap and related tools. We
|
||||
should probably look at our needs and options and then decide on and
|
||||
either install it on our own infrastructure or use it hosted elsewhere.
|
||||
- David notes that Trac seems to work well for Tor -- see
|
||||
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor
|
||||
- One thing which can be nice is being able to interact with the
|
||||
system through email. Like for bugs people file on the Nmap package
|
||||
in Debian, I can just reply to the mail and it gets added in the tracker.
|
||||
|
||||
o Make CONCURRENCY_LIMIT in nse_main.lua at least the min-parallelism.
|
||||
Otherwise NSE is limited to 1000 socket-using threads even if you've
|
||||
requested more.
|
||||
|
|
@ -115,6 +124,12 @@ o Investigate WinPcap support for NDIS 6.
|
|||
I'm not sure what Windows releases support NDIS 6 or what the
|
||||
backward compatability is like.
|
||||
|
||||
o Consider re-architecting Nmap to have more of a scanning pipeline
|
||||
approach rather than fixed sets of hosts which start and finish one
|
||||
phase and then move into the next in parallel. This could potentially
|
||||
allow us to add hosts one by one to a phase as other hosts finish that
|
||||
phase and, ideally, the phases could run in parallel too.
|
||||
|
||||
o NSE WORK (note that this is mostly infrastructure because script
|
||||
ideas are generally put on the script ideas page instead:
|
||||
https://secwiki.org/w/Nmap_Script_Ideas)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue