note a poor warning message

This commit is contained in:
fyodor 2009-03-08 03:34:23 +00:00
parent 712b2583a1
commit 5ca8c50d34

View file

@ -218,6 +218,21 @@ o Look into memory consumption of UDP scans with -p- and large
hostgroups. See if there is a way to prevent them from eating up gigs
of RAM.
o When I scan large groups of hosts with OS detection enabled, I get
groups of warnings like:
Insufficient responses for TCP sequencing (0), OS detection may be less accurate
Insufficient responses for TCP sequencing (0), OS detection may be less accurate
Insufficient responses for TCP sequencing (0), OS detection may be less accurate
Insufficient responses for TCP sequencing (0), OS detection may be less accurate
Insufficient responses for TCP sequencing (0), OS detection may be less accurate
Note how it doesn't even tell the relevant IP address, and it isn't
included in an individual host section. We should probably either
include it in the section for an individual host, like we do with
"OSScan results may be unreliable because we could not find at least
1 open and 1 closed port", or (not quite as
good) include the relevant IP address in the error message. And we
may or may not want to require verbose mode.
o Fix the directory function(s) in nse_fs.cc to be usable by scripts and
improve flexibility. [this entry added by Patrick]