Enhanced ChatGPT Clone: Features Agents, MCP, DeepSeek, Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, Responses API, Azure, Groq, o1, GPT-5, Mistral, OpenRouter, Vertex AI, Gemini, Artifacts, AI model switching, message search, Code Interpreter, langchain, DALL-E-3, OpenAPI Actions, Functions, Secure Multi-User Auth, Presets, open-source for self-hosting. Active. https://librechat.ai/
Find a file
Danny Avila fe30e3db32
🪫 fix: Back Off Failed Retention Deletes (#15608)
* 🧹 fix: Stop Undeletable Files Starving the Retention Sweep

`getExpiredFiles` returns the oldest `expiredAt` first, capped at `limit`,
and `processDeleteRequest` leaves the record in place when storage deletion
fails. Nothing records the failure, so the same files come back at the head
of the next batch an hour later, forever: no backoff, no cap, and — once
`limit` of them cannot be deleted — no file that expires afterwards is ever
swept again. On the deployment behind #15511 that is ~29k stranded objects
permanently occupying a 100-slot queue, which is why fixing the Code
Interpreter side alone (LibreChat-AI/code-interpreter#85) would not have
resumed deletion there.

Failures are now recorded on the file. `deletionRetryAt` holds it back with
a backoff doubling from one sweep interval to a day, and `deletionAttempts`
retires it from the query entirely once it reaches
`FILE_RETENTION_SWEEP_MAX_ATTEMPTS` (10, so roughly five days of retries).
Both fields are absent on existing records and absence means "never
attempted", so nothing already in the collection changes eligibility.

The record itself is kept rather than deleted — the reference is what an
operator needs to reconcile a bucket the sweep could not clear, and dropping
it would restore the silence that made this leak invisible. Raising
`FILE_RETENTION_SWEEP_MAX_ATTEMPTS` re-admits everything previously given up
on, which is the supported way to resume once the storage-side failure is
fixed; the give-up is logged with that instruction.

The counter is incremented server-side with `$inc` so concurrent sweeps on
separate nodes cannot overwrite each other's progress toward the cap, and a
failure to record a failure is logged and skipped rather than aborting the
rest of the batch.

* 🧭 fix: Delete Code Environment Files Through the Route That Exists

`deleteCodeEnvFile` tried `/sessions/:sid/objects/:fid` before falling back
to `/files/:sid/:fid`. Both have been there since #13424, but only the
second is mounted by any released codeapi — the first gained DELETE in
LibreChat-AI/code-interpreter#85 — so every deletion paid a guaranteed 404
and a wasted round trip, and #15511 read that 404 as the whole bug.

Call `/files/:sid/:fid` directly. It is the safe direction to collapse
toward: codeapi has mounted it since its first release, so this works
against older deployments as well as post-#85 ones, whereas keeping the
other path would not.

Collapsing the loop tightens two behaviours that only existed to serve it.
A 405 now surfaces instead of being swallowed on the way to a second
attempt; there is no second route to try, and a service that refuses the
method should say so. A 404 is still treated as "already gone" — that is
the only thing it can now mean — but it is logged rather than passed over
in silence, because a 404 caused by a misconfigured base URL looks
identical and this branch drops the file's metadata record either way.

* 🔒 fix: Settle sweep retry state from the write, not the read

Two findings from the review of 0e52924.

- `recordFailure` derived the attempt number by adding one to the count the
  batch had queried. Two nodes sweeping the same file read the same value,
  so both believed themselves to be the same attempt: each `$inc` landed,
  the stored count crossed `FILE_RETENTION_SWEEP_MAX_ATTEMPTS`, and neither
  caller ever saw the threshold. The file drops out of the query — the
  starvation guard still holds — but the give-up is never reported, and
  that log line is the operator's only notice, and carries the instruction
  for resuming. Return the count from the increment itself so every caller
  gets a distinct attempt number and exactly one observes the cap.

  The same staleness shortened the backoff, so `deferExpiredFile` now
  writes with `$max`: a deferral can only move later, and a node that
  computed a shorter delay cannot pull the file forward past one another
  node already committed.

- The backoff doubled from a hard-coded hour while claiming to start from
  one sweep interval. At the default they coincide; away from it the
  schedule stops meaning anything — on a six-hour sweep the first three
  attempts all land on consecutive passes, and on a five-minute one the
  first retry skips twelve. Derive the base from
  `FILE_RETENTION_SWEEP_INTERVAL_MS`, floored at a minute so a
  pathologically short interval cannot spend the whole give-up budget on a
  transient outage.

* 🧯 fix: Keep the give-up notice and the retry budget honest

Four findings from the review of ee1bac5.

- The give-up was reported after the deferral write, inside the same catch.
  Once the increment lands the counter is durable, so `getExpiredFiles`
  already excludes the file; a deferral that then failed left only the
  generic recording error and dropped the one line naming the file and
  saying how to resume. Report it as soon as the increment returns, and let
  the deferral fail on its own.

- Retry deadlines were measured from `Date.now()` after the deletion I/O,
  but `startExpiredFileSweep` arms its interval before the sweep runs. A
  one-interval delay therefore expired just *after* the next scheduled
  pass, which skipped the file and pushed its first retry out by a whole
  extra interval — and the same drift applied to every delay that is an
  exact multiple. Anchor deadlines to the sweep's start instead.

- The threshold used `>=`, so once two nodes pushed a file past the cap
  every one of them past it logged the give-up: one error per replica per
  exhausted file rather than one actionable notice. Only the attempt that
  lands exactly on the cap reports it.

- Retry state outlived the content it described. `processCodeOutput` reuses
  a record for a repeated `(filename, conversationId)` — new bytes, new
  storage key, and a fresh `expiredAt` from `getRetentionExpiry` — while
  `createFile` and `updateFile` set only supplied fields. A record carried
  to the cap by its previous content stayed excluded from the sweep
  forever, stranding the new object exactly as this PR set out to prevent;
  a partially failed one started the new object's budget already spent.
  Both write paths now clear the fields: the budget belongs to the storage
  a record currently points at.

The retry-state fixtures in `file.spec.ts` were seeded through `createFile`,
which now clears them, so they drive the real methods the sweep uses.

* 🎯 fix: Clear the retry budget only when a retention lifecycle starts

Both findings from the review of 8d26f9b, and both are consequences of that
commit's reset rather than of the original change.

- The reset was unconditional on every `createFile`/`updateFile`, on the
  reasoning that those paths write content. Two of them do not.
  `prepareImages{Local,Azure,Firebase}` call `updateFile({ file_id })` with
  nothing but the id — a TTL touch — every time an existing image is
  encoded for another chat, and the deferred preview uses the same method
  to transition `status`. Either handed a stranded record a fresh set of
  attempts and another give-up notice, on repeat, defeating the cap for the
  files most likely to be stranded.

  Gate it on the write actually setting `expiredAt`. The budget belongs to
  a retention lifecycle: that is the write which starts a new one, it is
  what `processCodeOutput` supplies when it repurposes a record, and a
  record with no retention deadline is never swept, so the fields are inert
  there anyway.

- Both retry writes bumped `updatedAt`. `processCodeOutput` falls back to
  `updatedAt` as the writer-order stamp for records that predate
  `metadata.sourceDispatchedAt`, so a failed sweep landing mid-harvest read
  as a newer content writer and the harvest dropped its attachment. Mark
  them `timestamps: false`, for the reason `claimCodeFile` already does:
  bookkeeping is not a content write.

* 🅿️ refactor: Park exhausted files instead of excluding them

Three review rounds in a row found defects in how the give-up cap interacts
with record reuse, each in the fix for the last. That is a design error, not
a bug list: a permanent exclusion has to be bound precisely to the content
lifecycle it was recorded against, and File records outlive their content.
`processCodeOutput` repurposes a row for a repeated
`(filename, conversationId)`, `createFile`/`updateFile` set only supplied
fields, and `getRetentionExpiry` returns `{}` on a lookup failure so the row
inherits its old deadline — three separate ways for bookkeeping to survive
into a lifecycle it does not describe, each needing its own guard, and the
two retry writes needing to be lifecycle-conditional on top.

Remove the category instead. `deletionRetryAt` becomes the sweep's only
hold, and reaching `FILE_RETENTION_SWEEP_MAX_ATTEMPTS` parks the file for a
month rather than excluding it. The bound on the batch is the same — a
stranded file costs one slot a month instead of one an hour — but a deadline
that outlives its content can only delay the next object, never lose it, so
nothing outside the sweep has to reason about this state at all.

That deletes more than it adds:

- `createFile` and `updateFile` go back to their original form. No reset, so
  no question of which writes install content, and `prepareImages*` and the
  deferred preview stop mattering here.
- `getExpiredFiles` loses `maxAttempts` and its `$and`; eligibility is one
  `$or` on the deadline.
- The interleaving race between the increment and the deferral degrades from
  a stranded object to a delayed one.

Working through a large backlog is throughput-bound either way: every
attempt costs a slot in the bounded batch, so N stranded files need N ×
`FILE_RETENTION_SWEEP_MAX_ATTEMPTS` passes to settle. Lower that limit when
recovering a deployment that has accumulated many.
2026-09-04 15:38:17 -04:00
.claude/skills
.devcontainer
.github
.husky
.vscode
api 🪫 fix: Back Off Failed Retention Deletes (#15608) 2026-09-04 15:38:17 -04:00
client 🪁 fix: Honor Endpoint Drop Params in Parameter Panels (#15610) 2026-09-04 13:52:23 -04:00
config
e2e
helm
otel/langfuse-fanout
packages 🪫 fix: Back Off Failed Retention Deletes (#15608) 2026-09-04 15:38:17 -04:00
redis-config
scripts
search
skill
src/tests
utils
.codex
.dockerignore
.env.example
.gitattributes
.gitignore
.nvmrc
.prettierrc
AGENTS.md
bun.lock
CLAUDE.md
CONTEXT.md
deploy-compose.langfuse-fanout.yml
deploy-compose.yml
docker-compose.langfuse-fanout.yml
docker-compose.override.yml.example
docker-compose.yml
Dockerfile
Dockerfile.multi
eslint.config.mjs
librechat.example.yaml
LICENSE
package-lock.json
package.json
rag.yml
README.md
README.zh.md
tool-intent-spec.md
turbo.json

LibreChat

English · 中文

Deploy on Railway Deploy on Zeabur Deploy on Sealos

Translation Progress

🚀 What's New in v0.8.8-rc2

  • Agent run control: Interrupt an Agent before visible answer text, steer runs with files and quoted excerpts, durably queue follow-ups, and recover saved partial work with Keep going or Answer now.
  • Agent activity: Optional generated labels group reasoning and tool work, fold completed groups into live phase cards, keep generated files visible, summarize multi-step phases, and show the current reasoning direction.
  • Human-in-the-loop Agents: Stream up to four related questions, pause for input or tool approval, and resume durably.
  • Unified Agent Builder: Configure Skills, MCP, Code Interpreter, orchestration, Programmatic Tool Calling, model-spec controls, and per-tool background and intent settings in one Tools marketplace; Skills can be enabled for standalone runtime authoring without exposing the existing catalog.
  • Durable Agent automation: Authenticated Agent Events support bound child actors, expected-action receipts, per-actor mailboxes, event batching, durable human pauses, and automatic detached Actions across built-in stream stores.
  • Deeper Subagent history: Browse branch-aware child turns with bounded reasoning and stable live event views, load earlier activity, inspect event details, continue completed child chats, and automatically wake saved parent Agents when detached work settles.
  • Background tools: Eligible Code Interpreter, MCP, Plugin, and Action tools can run while an Agent keeps working, with automatic delivery for supported completions and polling controls when needed.
  • Code Interpreter workflows: Sandbox images return as viewable artifacts; highly experimental stateful sessions add scoped managed, attached, or personal environments, per-message file downloads, and guarded file-write and command permissions.
  • Agent extensibility: Experimental Agent Plugins bundle deployment Skills, MCP servers, and opt-in command hooks; saved Agent teams run as isolated Subagent graphs.
  • Scheduled Chats (experimental): Run saved Agents with presets or custom cron, selectable time zones, multi-day weekly cadence, and optional Chat Project destinations.
  • Memory and context: Agents can use optionally isolated memory, preserve adaptive context fading across turns, and show categorized current-window usage, tokens, and optional cost.
  • Editable long pastes: Long pasted text becomes an editable attachment that can be moved back into the composer; attachment-only turns and reliable Upload as Text downloads are also supported.
  • Projects, settings, and navigation: Search conversation titles and message contents, manage project chats, use searchable settings and shortcuts, pin chats, choose clock/week conventions, and navigate faster on mobile.
  • Sharing and artifacts: Stable shared links support personal copies; fullscreen previews, Mermaid export, PowerPoint templates, shell scripts, and original Office downloads expand file workflows.
  • Web search: Keenable adds keyless search and page fetch, while SearXNG and Tavily gain richer controls and all web-tool egress uses stronger SSRF protection.
  • Security and authentication: Default HTTP security headers, opt-in nonce CSP, authenticated local images, per-user Code Interpreter JWTs, stable SAML identity binding, live-session OpenID token refresh, and retired JWT-secret rejection harden deployments.
  • Models and reasoning: Added GPT-5.6 with Responses reasoning controls, Claude Fable 5.1, Opus 5, and Sonnet 5, plus Gemini 3.8/3.7/3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
  • Langfuse observability: Configure encrypted in-app connections, tenant fanout, authenticated gateways, export-decision telemetry, and authorized session links in chats and shared views.
  • Administration: Source-aware content filters can audit or block model-bound data, while tenant Insights, delegated configuration, encrypted secrets, and expiring violation scores improve operations.
  • Streaming and reliability: Adaptive smoothing, Redis delta batching and failover recovery, automatic generation protocol v2, live MCP catalog refresh, Agent circuit breakers, and DocumentDB support improve long runs and scaled deployments.

Read the full v0.8.8-rc2 changelog.

✨ Features

  • 🖥️ UI & Experience inspired by ChatGPT with enhanced design and features

  • 🤖 AI Model Selection:

    • Anthropic (Claude), AWS Bedrock, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Google, Vertex AI, OpenAI Responses API (incl. Azure)
    • Custom Endpoints: Use any OpenAI-compatible API with LibreChat, no proxy required
    • Compatible with Local & Remote AI Providers:
      • Ollama, groq, Cohere, Mistral AI, Apple MLX, koboldcpp, together.ai,
      • OpenRouter, Helicone, Perplexity, ShuttleAI, Deepseek, Qwen, and more
  • 🔧 Code Interpreter API:

    • Secure, Sandboxed Execution in Python, Node.js (JS/TS), Go, C/C++, Java, PHP, Rust, and Fortran
    • Seamless File Handling: Upload, process, and download files directly
    • No Privacy Concerns: Fully isolated and secure execution
    • Open-Source & Self-Hostable: powered by ClickHouse/code-interpreter
  • 🔦 Agents & Tools Integration:

    • LibreChat Agents:
      • No-Code Custom Assistants: Build specialized, AI-driven helpers
      • Agent Marketplace: Discover and deploy community-built agents
      • Collaborative Sharing: Share agents with specific users and groups
      • Flexible & Extensible: Use MCP Servers, tools, file search, code execution, and more
      • Skills: Create reusable SKILL.md instruction bundles for manual, automatic, or always-on agent workflows
      • Agent Plugins: Experimentally bundle deployment Skills and MCP servers into startup-loaded packages
      • Subagents: Delegate focused work to isolated child agent runs with their own context windows
      • Compatible with Custom Endpoints, OpenAI, Azure, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google, Vertex AI, Responses API, and more
      • Model Context Protocol (MCP) Support for Tools
  • 🔍 Web Search:

    • Search the internet and retrieve relevant information to enhance your AI context
    • Combines search providers, content scrapers, and result rerankers for optimal results
    • Customizable Jina Reranking: Configure custom Jina API URLs for reranking services
    • Learn More →
  • 🪄 Generative UI with Code Artifacts:

    • Code Artifacts create React, HTML, and Mermaid content directly in chat
    • Open previews fullscreen and export Mermaid diagrams as SVG or PNG
  • 🎨 Image Generation & Editing

  • 💾 Presets & Context Management:

    • Create, Save, & Share Custom Presets
    • Switch between AI Endpoints and Presets mid-chat
    • Edit, Resubmit, and Continue Messages with Conversation branching
    • Create and share prompts with specific users and groups
    • Fork Messages & Conversations for Advanced Context control
  • 💬 Multimodal & File Interactions:

    • Upload and analyze images with Claude 3, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o1, Llama-Vision, and Gemini 📸
    • Chat with Files using Custom Endpoints, OpenAI, Azure, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, & Google 🗃️
  • 🌎 Multilingual UI:

    • English, 中文 (简体), 中文 (繁體), العربية, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano
    • Polski, Português (PT), Português (BR), Русский, 日本語, Svenska, 한국어, Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe, Nederlands, עברית, Català, Čeština, Dansk, Eesti, فارسی
    • Suomi, Magyar, Հայերեն, Bahasa Indonesia, ქართული, Latviešu, ไทย, ئۇيغۇرچە
  • 🧠 Reasoning UI:

    • Dynamic Reasoning UI for Chain-of-Thought/Reasoning AI models like DeepSeek-R1
  • 🎨 Customizable Interface:

    • Customizable Dropdown & Interface that adapts to both power users and newcomers
  • 🌊 Resumable Streams:

    • Never lose a response: AI responses automatically reconnect and resume if your connection drops
    • Multi-Tab & Multi-Device Sync: Open the same chat in multiple tabs or pick up on another device
    • Production-Ready: Works from single-server setups to horizontally scaled deployments with Redis
  • 🗣️ Speech & Audio:

    • Chat hands-free with Speech-to-Text and Text-to-Speech
    • Automatically send and play Audio
    • Supports OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, and Elevenlabs
  • 📥 Import & Export Conversations:

    • Import Conversations from LibreChat, ChatGPT, Chatbot UI
    • Export conversations as screenshots, markdown, text, json
  • 🔍 Search & Discovery:

    • Search all messages/conversations
  • 👥 Multi-User & Secure Access:

    • Multi-User, Secure Authentication with OAuth2, LDAP, & Email Login Support
    • Built-in Moderation, and Token spend tools
  • 🎛️ Admin Panel:

    • Browser-based UI to manage users, groups, roles, and configuration overrides
    • Edit settings and per-role/group permissions live, without redeploying
    • Bundled with the Docker Compose stacks for one-command setup
  • ⚙️ Configuration & Deployment:

    • Configure Proxy, Reverse Proxy, Docker, & many Deployment options
    • Use S3 with CloudFront for stable media links, edge delivery, signed cookies, and secured downloads
    • Use completely local or deploy on the cloud
  • 📖 Open-Source & Community:

    • Completely Open-Source & Built in Public
    • Community-driven development, support, and feedback

For a thorough review of our features, see our docs here 📚

🪶 All-In-One AI Conversations with LibreChat

LibreChat is a self-hosted AI chat platform that unifies all major AI providers in a single, privacy-focused interface.

Beyond chat, LibreChat provides AI Agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) support, Artifacts, Code Interpreter, custom actions, conversation search, and enterprise-ready multi-user authentication.

Open source, actively developed, and built for anyone who values control over their AI infrastructure.


🌐 Resources

GitHub Repo:

Other:


📝 Changelog

Keep up with the latest updates by visiting the releases page and notes:

⚠️ Please consult the changelog for breaking changes before updating.


⭐ Star History

Star History Chart

danny-avila%2FLibreChat | Trendshift ROSS Index - Fastest Growing Open-Source Startups in Q1 2024 | Runa Capital


✨ Contributions

Contributions, suggestions, bug reports and fixes are welcome!

For new features, components, or extensions, please open an issue and discuss before sending a PR.

If you'd like to help translate LibreChat into your language, we'd love your contribution! Improving our translations not only makes LibreChat more accessible to users around the world but also enhances the overall user experience. Please check out our Translation Guide.


💖 This project exists in its current state thanks to all the people who contribute


🎉 Special Thanks

We thank Locize for their translation management tools that support multiple languages in LibreChat.

Locize Logo