mirror of
https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat.git
synced 2026-10-23 18:43:21 +00:00
* 🖼️ fix: Apply an Agent's Configured Image Detail The Agent Builder exposes an Image Detail slider and saves it to `model_parameters.imageDetail`, but nothing ever read it back: `encodeAndFormat` resolves the level from `req.body.imageDetail`, which the agents route never populates, so every image was encoded as `detail: "auto"`. Providers that reject `auto` — MiniMax's OpenAI-compatible API among them — fail every image upload through an agent, and the setting that would fix it has no effect. The root cause is a classification error rather than a missing argument. `extractLibreChatParams` splits LibreChat's own settings out of an agent's model parameters, and its key set is derived from the `librechat` group in `parameterSettings`. `imageDetail` sat in `baseDefinitions` instead, so it was neither extracted for LibreChat's use nor stripped from the options handed to the provider. It is now grouped with `resendFiles` and the other LibreChat-level parameters, which gives it the same path those already take: extracted during agent initialization, carried on the initialized agent, passed to the client, and read by `encodeAndFormat`. `AgentClient.getSaveOptions` already expected `options.imageDetail` — nothing had ever populated it. The request body still wins where it is set, so the classic endpoints keep resolving detail from conversation settings exactly as before. Fixes #15359 * 🔤 fix: Type Image Detail as Its Enum, Not a Bare String `TConversation.imageDetail` is the `ImageDetail` enum, so the extractor's return type and the initialized agent's field are now declared as that enum rather than widened to `string`, and the tests pass enum members instead of raw literals. Caught by CI's type check, which I had run before adding the tests and not after — jest compiles the specs through babel, so the suite stayed green over a type error.
55 lines
1.6 KiB
JavaScript
55 lines
1.6 KiB
JavaScript
const mockEncodeAndFormat = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ files: [], image_urls: [] });
|
|
|
|
jest.mock('~/server/services/Files/images/encode', () => ({
|
|
encodeAndFormat: (...args) => mockEncodeAndFormat(...args),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const AgentClient = require('./client');
|
|
|
|
describe('AgentClient.addImageURLs - image detail', () => {
|
|
const buildClient = (options) => {
|
|
const client = Object.create(AgentClient.prototype);
|
|
client.options = {
|
|
req: { body: {} },
|
|
endpoint: 'agents',
|
|
agent: { id: 'agent_1', provider: 'openai' },
|
|
...options,
|
|
};
|
|
return client;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
jest.clearAllMocks();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("forwards the agent's configured detail to the encoder", async () => {
|
|
const client = buildClient({ imageDetail: 'high' });
|
|
|
|
await client.addImageURLs({}, [{ file_id: 'f_1' }]);
|
|
|
|
expect(mockEncodeAndFormat).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
expect(mockEncodeAndFormat.mock.calls[0][2]).toEqual(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ imageDetail: 'high' }),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('leaves the detail undefined when the agent configures none, so the encoder falls back', async () => {
|
|
const client = buildClient({});
|
|
|
|
await client.addImageURLs({}, [{ file_id: 'f_1' }]);
|
|
|
|
expect(mockEncodeAndFormat.mock.calls[0][2].imageDetail).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('still passes the provider and endpoint alongside the detail', async () => {
|
|
const client = buildClient({ imageDetail: 'low' });
|
|
|
|
await client.addImageURLs({}, [{ file_id: 'f_1' }]);
|
|
|
|
expect(mockEncodeAndFormat.mock.calls[0][2]).toEqual({
|
|
provider: 'openai',
|
|
endpoint: 'agents',
|
|
imageDetail: 'low',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|